I watched a fascinating talk about creativity given by Sir Ken Robinson. He argues that the current education system kills creativity. The whole system, in his view, is a "12 year preparation course" for university; it, therefore, stymies any talents or skills that are useless for a university career - dance, drama, art, music, anything with your hands. As I am in the early stages of teaching a SAT prep class, his theory is particularly interesting. I'm teaching these kids how to pass a test that gets them into university. My lessons are filled with "top tips" and "triggers" that the kids are meant to memorize to become "smart test takers". I'm teaching a class devoid of any smidgen of creativity. It's depressing to write this, let alone deal with the actual reality of it. Needless to say, I'm struggling with the class. But, to go to college the kids need to take this test. I want them to do well, but I'd much prefer a system where they can shine with their natural skills not shine with their ability to take a test well.
Obviously, this leads me to think about Rose and her future education. I'm already investigating all the different options and am intrigued by the Montessori model. From what I can gather so far, a student's learning is guided by self-discovery and personal interests, rather than teacher mandated assignments. I'm going to do a lot more research, but I like the sound of it so far.
Pickwick paper is started and it is BIG. There may need to be a renewel on this one.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment